On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 9:27:51 AM UTC-5, Erik Christiansen wrote: > On 30.07.13 06:57, Ben Fritz wrote: > > > Maybe better using "very magic": > > > > Everything's better with \v ;-) > >
Yes. I occasionally edit portions of my .vimrc where I didn't used it, and wonder why. > > > \v<\d+>\.@! > > > > On the test line: > > > > 123 123.0 123. 456 0.123 .123 789 > > The OP specifically said that valid decimals are "in the form 1.0D0, or more precisely \d\+\.\d\+D\d\+" so I didn't try stuff like "123." or ".123". But possibly as in the other thread we need to account for negative numbers? > > that regex also detects the fractional parts as integers, so it still > > needs a tweak. This seems to do it: > > > > /\v\.@<!<\d+>\.@! > > Good. Even without the narrow constraints I assumed it's fairly easy to tweak to get it more correct. For the OP, Erik added a negative look-behind (similar to the look-ahead my first response used but constraining what comes BEFORE instead). See :help /\@<! > > But even that finds 06 and 57 in 06:57. Whether they are desired > > integers may vary between use cases. Admittedly they'll probably only > > crop up in rare strings in a fortran program. > Good point...but these would be harder to guard against. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
