On Aug 30, 2013 9:34 PM, "Chris Lott" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Francis Ngoh <[email protected]> wrote: > > Im away from my computer but I found a workaround ... ie dont use numbered > > registers for the macro. > > > Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see how this solves the > problem. dt" isn't using a numbered register, it's deleting to the > character "
Numbered registers are populated from deletes unless another register was specified. The help states though that one-line deletes should not affect numbered registers (with some exceptions, but "t" is not the one). > c > -- > Chris Lott <[email protected]> > > -- > -- > You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. > Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. > For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
