On Sep 26, 2013 2:18 PM, "Marco" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2013–09–26 Nikolay Pavlov wrote: > > > > Since there is little chance that an underscore will immediately follow a > > > control sequence anyway, I don't think defining it for the entire syntax > > file > > > will cause any problem. > > > > It is very common in LaTeX math: > > > > \int_a^b > > “a” is not a control sequence.
Assuming _ is defined to be a part of a command this will incorrectly highlight _a with the same color as \int. Thus you cannot just follow that advice. > > . Can't say anything about context though. > > The maths looks almost the same, it's mostly TeX anyway. > > > In LaTeX/TeX syntax file AFAIR _ is marked as an error outside of > > math regions though. > > Not so in ConTeXt. Underscores and circumflex accents are valid > input: > > \starttext > This_is_valid %% the _ is not marked as error, correct > So ^ is ^ this %% the ^ is marked as error, although it's valid input > \stoptext > > Marco -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
