On Oct 29, 2013, at 8:42 AM, Erik Christiansen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry, but the proposed "new" icons seem a great step backwards, in > every regard. (You'll have to judge whether that's 2c worth, or you want > some money back.) I am probably not the best judge of the direction in which any given icon is taking steps but I do like the (green!) “Icons” in that attachment at http://article.gmane.org/gmane.editors.vim/112613 and fail to see how they are not either modern or elegant (regarding whether they are “crisp”: that first-linked logo -- the current one, if I am not mistaken -- is an SVG, so...). Ben -- b
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
