On 2014-02-15, mvxxc wrote: > Gary Johnson, 13.02.2014 13:32: > [...] > > In my experiments, this behavior was not affected by 'linebreak'. > [...] > > Sorry for the second reply, but it seems that formatting really behaves > differently if "linebreak" is set. After setting options with > ":se all& co=79 tw=80", place the cursor in the first test line and format > both > lines with "gqj". Try this with and without "linebreak". > > xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx > xxx > xxx > > In the first case, there are two words in the second line; in the second case, > it is just one word. This can also be reproduced when starting Vim with > "vim -u NONE +'se all& co=79 tw=80'". If I have made a mistake, please let me > know.
With those settings, I see that, too. Looks like a bug to me. Regards, Gary -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
