On Friday, 2 January 2015 19:18:27 UTC+1, Ben Fritz wrote: > On Friday, January 2, 2015 11:46:17 AM UTC-6, Shiny Bling wrote: > > On Friday, 2 January 2015 18:28:19 UTC+1, Дарио Ѓорѓевски wrote: > > > Are your compiles 32- or 64-bit? > > > > 32bit. Is there any real advantage having 64 build? > > > > I started self-compiling 64-bit, mainly because there is a server at work I > use for a couple web services I administer, which is running Windows Server > 2008 R2 and does not include the WOW64 system (and thus cannot run 32-bit > binaries). > > But I doubt very many people need a fully-featured Vim with all dependency > DLLs for that. I think I haven't updated that install since sometime late in > Version 7.3.x. > > The other advantage is when using :! to run some standard system utilities > like chcp which are not on the 32-bit path by default. But there are > workarounds for that. > > That, and you can install 64-bit versions of the dependency DLLs. But you've > gotten rid of that sort of concern. > > List of other reasons here, mostly not all that compelling: > http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Where_to_download_Vim
Thanks, I leave the 64bit build for later then. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
