Hi Christian and Charles, I gave quick look to the file Charles suggests and it seem doable. Thanks.
Christian, I know syntax coloring does not work as I would like. But if you think about it, it is quite strange. I'd expected that stuff like == vs != or != vs =! have totally different colors, I don't need a color to say: "look there is an operator here." On the other hand a different color to underline that there is a different operator is useful. Yours sincerely, Paolo On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Christian Brabandt <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Paolo! > > On Mi, 31 Dez 2014, Paolo Bolzoni wrote: > >> Really? No-one knows how to change the syntax coloring rules? > > It can probably be done, you simply need to add custom syntax rules for > each operator and color each one directly. I have not seen such a thing, > however (which doesn't mean anything however). > > Best, > Christian > -- > Bernd Eckenfels: gut geklaut :) > Lutz Donnerhacke: Natürlich, auf gute Gedanken komme ich eh' nicht von allein. > > -- > -- > You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. > Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. > For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "vim_use" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
