2015-02-23 17:47 GMT+03:00 Paolo Bolzoni <[email protected]>:
> Dear everyone, > > It is possible to change the meaning of . so it repeats the last > command, whatever it was a normal command or a ex command? I find > confusing that I can type dw..., but not :cNext<cr>.. > Dot was *never* meant to repeat non-editing commands. `dw` is repeated because you edit buffer with it, but something like `/foo` is not repeated by dot (though `d/foo` will). Repeating `:cNext` will completely break the meaning of dot because :cNext is not about editing anything. Though Ex commands that edit something are not repeated by the dot as well. > > Yours faithfully, > Paolo > > -- > -- > You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. > Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. > For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "vim_use" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
