On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 09:46:01 -0500 toothpik <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 02:16:09PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > * glts <[email protected]> [2015-03-22 02:21 -0700]: > > > > On Saturday, March 21, 2015 at 5:12:17 PM UTC+1, porphyry5 wrote: > > > > (...) > > > > > > > > Thank you, by a happy coincidence it has occurred again, and > > > > :verbose set tw? > > > > reveals the culprit to be /usr/share/vim/vim74/ftplugin/vim.vim > > > > maintained by one Bram Moolenaar > > > > rather incontrovertibly proving my claim that this thing was set by vim > > > > itself. > > > > > > > > Thank you again, its easy to fix. > > > > > > Arguably this is a mistake in the vim ftplugin. > > > It turns out that vim.vim sets tw=78 only if the user has set tw=0: > > > " Format comments to be up to 78 characters long > > if &tw == 0 > > setlocal tw=78 > > endif > > > It might not be a mistake, though. > > a comment above that code implies the textwidth adjustment is there so > comments will be nicely formatted, but (and it sure looks like a bug to > me) the setting applies to the whole buffer, not just the comments > > if we were voting on this I'd vote to remove it > Of course, it should be removed, unless a humiliation on users is indented by design. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
