Hello! I started this thread on vim_dev[1] and it was suggested I continue here instead.
> I fail to understand, why this is a problem, but you should be able to work > around that using the writefile() function, which seems to be better suited > for such a case. Over the course of a day that VimL runs hundreds or thousands of times, and when I only work on a dozen files it seems...inefficient that the buffer number is up in the hundreds or higher. It doesn't break anything but it's an unwanted side-effect. I looked at writefile() and confess I was confused by its documentation. How does one call it so that the buffer's contents are written exactly as-is, i.e. without changing line endings or adding/removing a final line ending? Many thanks, Andy [1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/vim_dev/oDyCq5Al7FY -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
