sorry typo Perhaps, if we remove OnTheSpot, most of users will not bother.
On 5/7/15, mattn <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday, May 7, 2015 at 9:01:30 PM UTC+9, Bram Moolenaar wrote: >> Yasuhiro Matsumoto wrote: >> >> > Bram, we multi-byte users want to fix. Most of users that uses >> > input-method on gvim doesn't satisfied by current behavior. So I hope >> > to remove OnTheSpot. Or how about to add new option to change behavior >> > OverTheSpot/OnTheSpot? >> >> I do not use input methods myself. I would rather leave it to people >> who do use it. Do please keep in mind that for different countries >> different methods will be preferred. I hope this will not result in a >> war! > > In my personally thinking, we can add new option to: > > * keep current behavior (default) > * implement OnTheSpot > > I don't make sure, but I'm guessing, most of IM users don't satisfy by > current behavior, as i said in above. If using fcitx, the preediting text is > not displayed on screen since fcitx add "gvim" into blacklist to disable > preediting. > > https://github.com/fcitx/fcitx/pull/125/files > > And, the preediting have critical bug that break key-mappings. Perhaps, if > we remove OverTheSpot, most of users will not bother. > > - mattn > -- - Yasuhiro Matsumoto -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
