On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 06:48:47PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote: > Further, if we want to be 100% immune to list point mimicry due to > unfortunate wrapping, then it is essential to choose a unique regex. > That would seem to require choice of a unique suffix, since the rest > is quite ordinary text. > > With '\.' susceptible, and ')' no safer, I'd look at some of these: > > 1] asdjk kjasldjlkjklj kljaslkdjakljsd lkjadslkjaskldjklaj ljlkj > > [...] > > If using utf-8, then an even safer option might be choosing a > thoroughly weird character, like the fat little bullet symbol I've > seen once or twice.
OK, thanks. Probably I will have to choose that method as the simplest to implement. Luckily, most of the time I don't have to use explicit numbering (e.g. with ReST). If I have time I will look into the formatexpr (mentioned earlier) as well. -- Marcin Szewczyk http://wodny.org mailto:[email protected] <- remove b / usuĊ b xmpp:[email protected] xmpp:[email protected] -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
