Hi Josef!
On Mi, 02 Sep 2015, Josef Fortier wrote:
> An update (for any future googling)
>
> I was trying to do a command. The '> marks almost work correctly, but the
> results were inconsistent.
>
> My goal was to have a single command that could have an optional range. The
> command worked for a single line, or a range the first time, but after a
> range had been visually selected the function could no longer recognize the
> single line invocation. The complete fix appears to have several parts:
>
> 1) The command has -range flag. The missing piece for me, this sets some
> variables <line1> and <line2> which are the beginning and and of the range.
> 2) within the function I still need the '< mark.
>
> When their was a prior range, the '< mark will read 1 but the <line1> will not
Can you explain the problem in more detail? I don't have the old thread
around. Please be precise and explain exactly what you did, expect and
see.
Best,
Christian
--
Lebhafte Frage nach der Ursache, Verwechselung von Ursache und
Wirkung, Beruhigung in einer falschen Theorie sind von großer, nicht
zu entwickelnder Schädlichkeit.
-- Goethe, Maximen und Reflektionen, Nr. 904
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
