Christian Brabandt wrote: > On Mo, 07 Dez 2015, Nikolay Aleksandrovich Pavlov wrote: > > > I have mistaken `visualmode()` output with `getregtype()` output. This > > suggestion could be a solution if `visualmode()` returned the same > > answer as `getregtype()`. > >=20 > > I am wondering thus whether it make sense to have `visualmode(0, 1)` > > output for block visual mode the same thing as `getregtype()` for > > blockwise registers, but with possible `$` after the number. Modifying > > `col()` to return some seeming arbitrary very big number looks weird. > > Like this? > > I am not sure, how useful it is to have the width without also having > the height, but I made it return the visual width unless '$' has been > used.
I find this confusing, because now it's not the same as getregtype(). And visualmode() has an optional argument to clear the mode, which is unrelated. Is there a more consistent solution? -- Your fault: core dumped /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
