On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 9:43:24 AM UTC-5, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Matthew Desjardins wrote: > > > I like the current implementation, but what about "after" directories? > > Is it just me or are those missing, too? > > The "after" directory is mosly useful to add your personal preferences. > In what situation would you want to use an "after" directory in a > package? >
Possibly, checking the installed version of a plugin you depend on, and acting accordingly? I suppose now you could force the other plugin to load first, right? Also for filetype plugins which *add to* existing filetypes. But of course loading the existing files with a :runtime command is probably an option. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
