On 2016-07-24 15:02, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> What has stopped me from changing this is the unexpected change.
> Many users will notice that Vim suddenly behaves differently.  Some
> may be upset.  The release of Vim 8.0 might be the best point in
> time to do this.  If we do this.

Agreed that 8.0 is a good break-a-little-compatibility-if-needed
moment compared to a point release.

Though my understanding is that vim behaves differently if invoked as
"vi" vs. "vim"/"gvim" and if there's a .vimrc vs no .vimrc

So if invoked as "vi" and there's no .vimrc, I'd expect 'compatible'
behavior with no/minimal breaking changes.  However if there's
indication that the user wants vim-not-vi (either invoking as "vim"
or having a .vimrc/.gvimrc), then I'd be more open to more
invasive/incompatible changes.

> If someone wants to start in the old way, the -C flag should be
> used: vim -C

I'd also include "or invoking as `vi` or having no .vimrc"

> What we can probably always do:
> 
>   set backspace=indent,eol,start

+1 here

>   set history=50      " keep 50 lines of command line history

at *least* 50 but otherwise +1

>   set ruler           " show the cursor position all the time

I'm slightly concerned about things that eat more screen real-estate
unbidden.  Not *greatly* concerned, but at least enough to raise the
issue. +0

>   set showcmd         " display incomplete commands

+1

>   set incsearch               " do incremental searching

My only concern here is that some regexps can have pathological
search time, and searching unbidden (either by hitting enter or by
using 'incsearch') can hang vim.

>   " Don't use Ex mode, use Q for formatting
>   map Q gq

I don't object in vim; only mildly concerned regarding vi (would have
to dredge up a POSIX vi to check whether Q was used).  But mostly Q
is an annoyance to just about everybody I've talked to, good only for
VimGolf hacks.

>   " In many terminal emulators the mouse works just fine, thus
> enable it. if has('mouse')
>     set mouse=a
>   endif

I don't have much input here as I don't use the mouse with vim (other
than middle-button pasting content as if I typed it)

>   if &t_Co > 2 || has("gui_running")
>     syntax on

It may ruffle some feathers, but again, if it's vim-not-vi, I think
most users already do something like this; and that those who don't
prefer to invoke it as vi.

>     set hlsearch

The 'hlsearch' annoys me and is the sort of thing I only turn on as
needed and then promptly turn back off again.  Pretty -1 on this one.

>   if has("autocmd")
>     " Enable file type detection.
>     filetype plugin indent on

Might get some detractors, but I don't object here.

>     " For all text files set 'textwidth' to 78 characters.
>     autocmd FileType text setlocal textwidth=78

I'd find this more annoying.  I tend to jockey 'tw' based on my
environment/content.  Email gets tw=65, my HTML is usually tw=75, my
prose is often tw=0, etc.  

>     autocmd BufReadPost *
>       \ if line("'\"") >= 1 && line("'\"") <= line("$") |
>       \   exe "normal! g`\"" |
>       \ endif

How would this interact with command-line offsets if the file had
been previously edited?

  $ vim +21 file.txt

I'd also want to ensure it doesn't impact scripts/macros that assume
files start at the same place.  Currently, I can do things like

  $ vim *.html
  :argdo /<h\d\>\c/put='below first HTML heading'

and know where things will go.  But if the cursor location is
restored when a buffer is opened, that might drop me in an unexpected
location.

So I'd vote as a -0 on that one.


As a backwards incompatible change, my biggest want would be that the
outer-quotation text objects (a" and a') would no longer eat leading
whitespace.  I've never wanted the out-of-box behavior, always
wanting to change just the string-cum-quotes.

http://vim.1045645.n5.nabble.com/quotation-text-object-consternation-td5725045.html

Or at least an option to control that.

-tim




-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to