Thank you for your reply Bram,
And more generally thank you for your great work & continuous
involvement with Vim.
Some comments inline:
On 02/09/2017 04:06 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> I don't think it can be done with one command. Simplest seems to be to
> copy the text and then filter it.
> (visually select the text)
> YP
> gv
> :!filter-command
I was out of idea when I posted yesterday, but there is indeed a simple
workaround at least on some Unix-like systems:
:{range}! tee >(wc -l)
But I agree a more generic/cross-platform solution would be better.
> Would not be a bad idea to have an Ex command for this. Not sure what
> to call it, :feed perhaps? :writeread ?
>
For a really generic solution, the command should support a source range
and a destination range-or-address. At some point while experimenting I
thought there could be an option to the `!r` command.
Here is what I had in mind:
:{range-1}r[read]>[range-2] !{filter}
But, as you suggested, we may envision some new `feed` command instead:
:{range-1}fee[d][range-2] !{filter}
{range-1} is the destination range as specified for the `read` command.
[range-2] is the source range whose content is written on {filter} input
stream. [range-2] is optional and is equal to {range-1} if not specified.
What do you think of that?
--
-- Sylvain Leroux
-- [email protected]
-- http://www.chicoree.fr
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
