On 2017-02-13 13:34, Shawn H Corey wrote: > > The two patterns, \< and \> match w-word boundaries. Is there > something to match W-word boundaries? The best I came up with is: > > \(^\|\s\)\@<= > > I'm writing a syntax file for G+ comments where in-line styles start > with a W-word boundary, followed by a "*" for bold, "_" for italic, > and "-" for strikeout. \< and \> only works for italic. > > Does anyone know a more elegant way?
Depending on how your final expression is, \S might do the trick, or you can use a negative lookbehind assertion: \S\@<! So for your markdown words, it could be something like \S\@<!\S\+ -tim -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
