On 2017-09-11 09:48, Ben Fritz wrote: > On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 6:33:56 PM UTC-5, Tony Mechelynck > wrote: > > • if the 'paragraphs' option is not empty, then a dot in column 1 > > immediately followed by one of the disjoint character pairs > > making up 'paragraphs' is a paragraph start. By default, this > > means one > > of .IP .LP .PP .QP .P<space> .TP .HP .LI .Pp .Lp .It .pp .lp .ip .bp > > Is this option still actually useful to anyone today?
While I've done a the occasional groff/nroff/troff text-processing in the last decade, it hasn't been much. > If not, perhaps it's time to extend this option to repurpose it to > be actually useful in the modern world? And changing this up to allow smarter paragraph definitions (Christian's reply just came in re regexp paragraph definitions) would be great. I largely use either HTML (using <p> tags) or Markdown (using blank lines) but could see it being useful when coding to have something like "\<def \<" for Python. -tim -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
