I have a use case where the optimal tool for my need is gvim as I don't have
access to anything more suitable in the context. I am trying to invoke gvim as
a process to perform a replacement (no shell or batch based invocation).
The arguments I am passing (which are simply string joined with a space) are:
string[] arguments =
{
"-N",
"-u",
"NONE",
"-i",
"NONE",
"-n",
"-es",
"-c",
"\"%s/.*foo.*/bar/g | w\"",
@"x:\path\to\file"
};
The replacement is performed as expected, however the return code is 1. Is that
by design, or as a result of something I have done incorrectly? The facility
performing the invocation checks for a non zero return code and it would be
desirable for that to be the case when a genuine error has occurred.
Thanks
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
