On 2018-03-03 08:22, Renato Fabbri wrote: > The major drawback I found is that vim session do no recover the > terminal windows/buffers....
It depends on how you open your terminal windows. If you just use :terminal then if you use ":mksession", vim will only remember that you have a terminal. But if you use :terminal some_application --paremeter --other-parameter then ":mksession" will remember what was running in that window and re-spawn "some_application" with the appropriate arguments, not just a blank shell when you reload the session. For me, tmux (and GNU screen) provide additional benefits of 1) being able to monitor for silence/activity 2) the ability to re-connect to a session from a different connection (start something on one machine, then ssh into the machine from elsewhere and resume with everything where it was). It doesn't detract from the functionality of :terminal as I do like being able pause the :terminal and then interact by yanking/moving/pasting with the full power of vim, not just a vim-like approximation provided by tmux's copy-buffer mode. -tim -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
