On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 3:05:03 AM UTC-4, Lifepillar wrote: > On 13/07/2018 06:37, Robert wrote: > > On Thursday, July 12, 2018 at 10:51:40 PM UTC-4, Robert wrote: > >> I am creating a vim syntax file for GNU Rec as an exercise in creating a > >> new syntax file. > >> > >> The things that I need colored are: > >> > >> %word: > >> + > >> word: > >> # comment > > […] > > Had a late work night so did this: > > > > syntax match recField "\v^\w+:\s" > > syntax match recPlus "^+\s" > > syntax match recComment "^#.*" > > > > syntax region recDesc start="^%" end=":" contains=recField > > > > Everything works. Are those "optimal"? > > According to `:h syn-pattern`, syntax patterns are always interpreted > as if 'magic' is on, so \v can be removed. > > > Life.
If I take off the \v it breaks. So there is something wrong with how I am doing it. -- Bob -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
