On Do, 06 Dez 2018, Tim Chase wrote:
> Brought to my attention by this thread: > > https://www.reddit.com/r/vim/comments/a3e80i/is_vim_right_for_me/ > > It seems to me that :p should always only print the line, even if > 'number' is set. If you want to print the line with its line-number, > you can either use ":p#" (:help ex-flags) or even just ":#". But > without storing 'nu' and deactivating it before issuing and restoring > the state of 'nu' after, there's no way to get unnumbered results. I think this is demanded by Posix, as I have mentioned here: https://github.com/vim/vim/issues/2862 > Additionally, while reading over those docs, I encountered that > ":P[rint]" should do the same thing as ":p", but netrwPlugin.vim > overrides ":P" in a fairly stock environment (in a fresh OpenBSD > system, installed vim; invoking "vim" had netrwPlugin loaded). That > said, if invoked as "vim -u NONE", the `:P` works as documented. So > it seems like either the docs should be updated so that ":help :P" > goes to netrw docs; or netrw's "Pexplore" shouldn't override the > built-in ":P" Hm, we explicitly allow to overrule :Print since 7.3.054, but do not allow e.g. :Next > (and here's hoping that your mail-client doesn't turn all those > colon-P strings into smile-with-tongue-out emoji) :-P Best, Christian -- Wer in einer Gesellschaft ein Bonmot erklärt, hat seine Feinheit nicht verstanden. -- Jean Paul -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
