On 2020-01-11, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> I'm fighting the following strange behaviour:
> >From an xterm, in Linux:
> $ vim -S bar.vim foo.txt
>
> bar.vim is a very basic syntax file. What happens is that foo.txt gets
> edited but the syntax highlighting is missing.
> I can activate it via
> :so bar.vim
> but it should not be necessary. What's wrong?
>
> Note that
> $ gvim -S bar.vim foo.txt
> edits the file with syn. hi. active.
It works for me.
I created the following files,
----------------------------- bar.vim ------------------------------
syn keyword Statement cow
----------------------------- foo.txt ------------------------------
The cow stood in the pasture.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
and ran vim as follows:
$ vim -N -u NONE --cmd 'syntax on' -S bar.vim foo.txt
The word "cow" was highlighted in yellow, as expected.
The vim I used is a normal version, reasonably up to date.
$ vim --version
VIM - Vi IMproved 8.2 (2019 Dec 12, compiled Dec 17 2019 13:33:01)
Included patches: 1-18
Compiled by gary@aurora
Normal version with GTK2 GUI. Features included (+) or not (-):
...
Regards,
Gary
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_use/20200111185152.GA7193%40phoenix.
