Hakim Benoudjit wrote:
Hi,

Thanks for your email.
Please find attached the small script bash I tested where the variables i, j, limit_t, limit_j are unfortunately not highlighted in the standard for-loop, in contrast to the label variable in the for-each-like loop.

Hakim.

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 4:47 AM Charles Campbell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hakim Benoudjit wrote:
    >
    > Hi,
    >
    >
    > I wasn't sure if this was a bug or not, so I've updated my Vim
    version
    > to 8.2 on Ubuntu 18.04.
    >
    > And, as you can see below, the variables in the standard for-loop
    > aren't highlighted as they are in the following for loop:
    >
    >
    Hello:

    I'm the maintainer of syntax/sh.vim ; would you please send me an
    attachment of the code snippet you're having a problem with?

With the script you sent I can use hilinks.vim (http://www.drchip.org/astronaut/vim/index.html#HILINKS) to see what's happening.

In the for (( ... )) loop, the items inside are highlighted as shForPP ; ie. as inside a region.  The variables themselves are not individually identified.  The "<=" and other operators are highlighted as shTestOpr (ie. operators).  All is normal.

In the first echo ... the variables are, again, not identified as variables; instead, they're being shown as shDo->shDo->shEcho->shDoubleQuote ; ie. regular string highlighting.

In the second outside loop (ie. the one with "label"), label is not recognized as a variable.  Instead, its being recognized as being inside a for loop (shFor), so its being highlighted correctly for that situation.  Copying the echo "i:..." into the body of the "label" for loop shows its highlighted the same as in the other place.

Generally, I try not to identify variables because of the potential problems (is it really an alias? a function? etc); remember, the syntax highlighter isn't a parser.  I do have a shVar; I'll have to see if including it in the for loops' containment lists causes problems.

So, insofar as the variables are concerned, the highlighting is performing nominally.

That said, there seems to be some unwanted highlighting associated with the double quotes, and I'll look into that.

Regards,
Chip Campbell

--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_use/8937bba7-1ece-8d2e-31c4-8731e37474fc%40drchip.org.

Reply via email to