* Bram Moolenaar <b...@moolenaar.net> [230120 11:01]: > > > I think what he is asking is for the " mark to only be written to the > > viminfo file for buffers that have been modified. I'm not sure how to > > do this or if it is even possible, but it seems like a perfectly > > reasonable behavior to want. > > > > Perhaps a VimLeavePre autocommand that wipes unmodified buffers? What > > other settings for those buffers would not be saved to .viminfo? > > How about: > - When writing the buffer set some flag, e.g. b:did_write_this_buf > - When exiting, go through all buffers and those that don't have the > b:did_write_this_buf flag move the cursor to the " mark. > > Something like that.
I don't think we need another flag; just use the 'modified' option. I think this is what the OP wants, and is simpler. I also think Salman Halim's suggestion of using the . mark instead of the " mark is more useful. ...Marvin -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_use/Y8wKilsT9IqIj56h%40basil.wdw.
