this is all stuff that Dougg3 and Bbraun from 68kmla have already
accomplished.
Check this thread out.


so fantastic even the mod added his introduction.
http://68kmla.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=16544


On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 5:54 PM, J.S. Garrison <[email protected]> wrote:

> Wow, great backstory, Greg. I know you've been with the LEM Lists for a
> very long time and apparently associate with all things Apple for some
> time, too.
>
> So this thing is gonna go one of two ways. I find a IIsi and put it to the
> test, or it goes to Ebay for someone else to experiment on. The labels on
> the ROMS are printed, albeit crudely. That and the "Apple Confidential" on
> the labels seems to me to point to prototype, not
> engineering sample, which are always a little more crudely assembled and
> labeled.
>
> But the mystery stays. I'm pretty curious about what makes that ROM SIMM
> special, if it is. It would be nice to debug those ROMS
> just to see if anything fun was added to make the IIsi they were made for
> faster, better, different.
>
>
> Jeff Garrison
>
>  ------------------------------
>  *From:* Gregg Eshelman <[email protected]>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Monday, August 12, 2013 1:39 AM
>
> *Subject:* Re: Expert Vintage Member's Input Needed
>
>
>
> AFAIK, no IIsi shipped with a ROM SIMM and none were released later. From
> what you described it's probably from a prototype or possibly an
> engineering sample IIsi.
>
> A sort of "Holy Grail" of vintage Mac lovers are the "Mr. Clean" ROMs for
> Macs made prior to the IIci. Tid-Bits ran a short article on them, someone
> found a box with "Mr. Clean" written on it, in storage at Apple. In it were
> ROMs for the SE/30 and other Macs. It was presumed they were 32 bit clean
> ROMs used during the design of System 7.0 and the IIci. Having 32 bit clean
> ROMs for the SE, SE/30, and the pre IIci Mac II models would be very nice.
> Apple could have produced and sold them as upgrades but chose not to. :-(
> Nobody knows if they're still hidden somewhere at Apple.
>
> Apple's prototypes they released to developers (which they were supposed
> to later return but some didn't) tended to be almost identical to the
> production versions. The next stage was engineering samples, which almost
> always were identical to productions versions except sometimes missing
> labels on the cases.
>
> That was the last step for finding any problems or bugs Apple's own
> testing failed to find, and at least once they somehow missed a huge
> problem, but it turned out to be a non-issue because the product got
> canceled. Some years ago I conversed on IRC with a person who worked in
> Micron's RAM compatibility testing lab. Apple had sent the company several
> second version "Super Cubes" and every one of them had one of the RAM slots
> that didn't work*. A week later the Super Cube was a dead product. The
> disassembled ones (the lab always took the test subjects apart to mount the
> boards in fixtures so swapping RAM multiple times would be easier) are
> likely still in a bin in a Micron warehouse somewhere in Idaho. I figured
> that was the final nail for the Super Cube, after the slow sales of the
> original Apple didn't want to waste money fixing such a major screwup.
>
> I used to have a Yeager prototype Duo 280 (but alas, not the 280c) which
> had the lid and screen from a 250 on it and production style lables on the
> bottom stating it was a Yeager Prototype Unit, Not For Resale and that it
> was NOT tested to comply with FCC regulations. There was a glitch somewhere
> in the ROM which caused all the black pixels in window titlebars to be
> white in a narrow vertical stripe below the Edit menu. Only the title bars
> were affected, everything else on the screen was fine.
>
> I also had a Duo 230 engineering sample with no lables at all on the
> bottom and the printing on the screen bezel was different from the
> production version. Far as I could tell the ROM was identical to
> production. How'd I know it was an ES? It had pink labels on its innards
> with ENGINEERING SAMPLE and a note written in Sharpie on the metal frame -
> Glued and tested ground clips - followed by a date.
>
> I booted both clean and used a ROM image utility on them. I most likely
> have those files somewhere if someone wants to do a compare with production
> versions.
>
> *IIRC it was around the time Intel managed to have a similar bug in
> thousands of motherboards they shipped with one RAMBUS slot non-functional.
> HTH does a company like Apple or Intel manage to get a computer mainboard
> to a production state with a non-functional RAM slot? I guess it's a
> similar kind of stupid to the 47 story condo building that's almost
> finished in Spain - where the architects completely forgot to include any
> elevators in the design.
>
>
>   --
> --
> -----
> You received this message because you are a member of the Vintage Macs
> group.
> The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/vintagemacs.shtml and our
> netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To leave this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/vintage-macs
>
> Support for older Macs: http://lowendmac.com/services/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Vintage Macs" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>



-- 
Charles

-- 
-- 
-----
You received this message because you are a member of the Vintage Macs group.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/vintagemacs.shtml and our 
netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To leave this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/vintage-macs

Support for older Macs: http://lowendmac.com/services/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Vintage Macs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to