--- Terry Mathews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Very, very extremely bad FPU performance in 68k > series chips. FP was always > the one thing that Intel could mop the board with > Motorola over. > > Why isn't there a Seti@home client for 68k Macs? > > Sure, it'd be slow but slow is better than none. > > The problem is, even a Q840AV would probably take > longer than 6 months to > complete a complicated WU. > > *Don't flame me, that's just an educated guess*
No need to guess. A PM6100 can just complete a unit in the required time. There's actually a "Team 6100" doing seti@home. Some people have racks of 6100's running just that. ===== http://www.junkscience.com "All the Junk that's fit to Debunk!" __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com -- Vintage Macs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Enter To Win A | -- Canon PowerShot Digital Cameras start at $299 | Free iBook! | Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> Vintage Macs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/vintagemacs.shtml> The FAQ: <http://macfaq.org/> Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/vintage.macs%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
