On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 02:58:24AM +0100, Marten van de Kraats wrote: > On 17 Dec 2002 Deven Gallo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > >That's very impressive. I only say this because my network uses 100 MBps > >and I do a lot of file transfer between machines, so 10 MBps speeds would be > >extremely prohibitive. > > You really think so? In my experience the speed difference between 10 > and 100 MBps can only really be noticced when transferring really > large files over a network.
Wierd experience... :) It's also going to speed up latency sensitive applications. For any file a 1MB or more, it's going to be a huge benefit. The lower latency is also going to make things like NNTP and other chatty protocols faster as well. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Vintage Macs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Enter To Win A | -- Canon PowerShot Digital Cameras start at $299 | Free iBook! | Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> Vintage Macs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/vintagemacs.shtml> The FAQ: <http://macfaq.org/> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/vintage.macs%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
