>Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:46:52 -0500
>From: Fletch Brendan Good <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: new 68k for Dad

>If you need a third choice, I would actually suggest an LC (not an LC
>II or III), even though LowEndMac declared it a Road Apple. Though it
>is essentially a repackaging of the Mac II (it has a 68020),

If the LC were actually a repackaged Mac II, say with the NuBus slots 
removed and the SIMM slots reduced in number it would not be so bad. 
However, that is not the case.  The LC has a 16 bit path between the 
CPU and memory, where the Mac II has a 32 bit path.    This causes a 
very significant reduction in performance in the LC vs. the II. 
Additionally, the Mac II had a maximum RAM of 128 MB.   The LC goes 
up to 10 MB.    What's up with that?   It's not even a power of 2. 
Apple must have done something seriously stupid in the ROM and/or the 
memory map, because that's not the kind of number you're likely to 
get from a hardware limitation.

Basically, the LC could be a better machine with exactly the same 
hardware, if the ROM was better written.   It could be a pretty good 
machine, albeit a little more expensive with a wider data bus.

The marketing weenies were probably pressuring the engineering folks 
to build a machine that wouldn't compete with the IIsi and the 
abominable LC is what we got.  It didn't become what it should have 
been until the LC III.  I wouldn't be surprised to find that the 
design for the LC III was basically laying around during the entire 
lifetime of the LC and the LCII.

Wooo.   I wouldn't go on about this so much, but this is a pet peeve 
of mine about Apple.   They release models that are handicapped 
beyond the requirements of any cost savings.    By that, I mean that 
for the same money, and using pretty much the same parts, there have 
been several machines that could have been much better were it not 
for the marketing weenies.

It's darned inefficient, it is.

Anyway, don't dishonor the Mac II, which was a fine machine for its 
day, by saying that the LC is a close relative.   :-)

Jeff

-- 
Vintage Macs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

 Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com   | Enter To Win A |
 -- Canon PowerShot Digital Cameras start at $299   |  Free iBook!   |

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

Vintage Macs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/vintagemacs.shtml>
The FAQ:                <http://macfaq.org/>
  --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/vintage.macs%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com

Reply via email to