Therein lies your problem. I used System 4 for quite a while, and it was tiny and nimble and very nice on a 512. I remember System 3, too, but it was no OS for a computer with a hard drive.

But I really doubt that any Mac System older than System 6 will work with MacTCP. Maybe, just maybe, you could save some RAM by working with System 6.0.3 instead of 6.0.8 and still get MacTCP to work.

I would start with that, I think that is a spectacular accomplishment by itself, to put a 512Ke on the internet even as a client. Take a screenshot of a 512 that has its own IP address, no one will believe it!

At 6:36 PM -0500 3/3/2005, Thomas Burns wrote:
I think the serial port hard drive would be easier to find than the 3rd party ram upgrade. What if you dropped down to a lower system like 3 or 4? I think the recommended system for a 512 is like 3.2? MacTCP wouldn't work with that would it nor would WebStar would it?
--
Allan Hunter

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://home.earthlink.net/~ahunter>

--
Vintage Macs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com   | Enter To Win A |
-- Canon PowerShot Digital Cameras start at $299   |  Free iBook!   |

     Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

Vintage Macs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/vintagemacs.shtml>
 --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/vintage.macs%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

iPod Accessories for Less
at 1-800-iPOD.COM
Fast Delivery, Low Price, Good Deal
www.1800ipod.com

Reply via email to