Tom, Tom , Tom,..............you are a designer, and a good one, you have a tremendous since of history and style. Your explanation to me about design and style in the fifties was one of the most logical and meaningful treatments of the term, I have heard. Do you know this guy Nobel? Are you familiar with the magazine? Is he a real person? The whole story was so lame, I seriously wonder if it was just a joke. Bill Scott 61 Bambi, VAC & WBCCI #3221 1VP & Membership Chairman , WDCU http://www.servintfree.net/wbcci-dc/
Bill, Bill, Bill....................I have provided caps to highlight the redundancy in your statement. You have been interviewed by the press before, haven't you. I have never been not embarrassed when interviewed. Reporters brains are wired strangely and the eyes and ears have a misrouting circuit to their typing fingers. Oddly enough they can repeat a statement back to you at the interview verbatim, but it never makes it through to the "STORY". So this clown "dug up some FACTS" and scrambled them and came up with a frothy souffl� that falls a little flat with airstreamers. However, it will bring some more interesting people into the vintage camp and; even if some of it is for the "wrong" reasons, most of the newbies will be more good guys and gals in our ranks. Now - all kidding you aside, you are absolutely right! Tom Walden Bill Scott wrote: > > This article by Philip Nobel, is one of the most FACTUALLY INCORRECT AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS I have seen in MODERN NEWSPRINT. > > Bill Scott > http://invites.yahoo.com/
