I am glad this subject has been settled.  I travel overseas quite frequently.  
Having an unlocked phone enables me to use SIM cards for local numbers in the 
countries I visit, instead of having to pay exorbitant international roaming 
prices for using my American phone number overseas.  I was very disappointed 
when the library of congress decision came out in 2013.  I thought it was truly 
illogical and inadequate, since my carrier did not invent the iOS system I have 
on my iPhone and saw no digital copyrights to be protected. To me it was only a 
bias decision to consolidate the big corporation's rights of monopoly, and 
screw up the consumers.
Cheers,
Cris  

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Mike Arrigo
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 10:18 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: U.S. Carriers, You'll Have to Unlock Those Phones

This was definitely a long time coming, and I'm glad it's happened. For me at 
least, I think I still will continue to purchase unlocked devices out of the 
box, they cost a bit more but well worth it.
Original message:
> Hello All,

> I am delighted to post the following cNet News article for your 
> consideration.

> The URL to the original article is at the bottom of the text.

> Mark

> U.S. carriers, you'll have to unlock those phones

> Starting now, it will be much easier for people to jump from one 
> carrier to another and take their smartphone with them.

> by Don Reisinger

> The days of carriers locking down devices to keep customers in place 
> are officially dead.
> Starting now, all US carriers must comply with requests from postpaid 
> and prepaid customers to unlock their devices, as long as certain 
> parameters are met. The industry group CTIA had committed last year to 
> have all wireless carriers adhering to the regulation by February 11, 2015.

> The move follows from President Obama last year signing into law the 
> "Unlocking Consumer Choice and Wireless Competition Act," which 
> overruled a controversial 2012 decision by the Library of Congress.

> The debate over phone unlocking has come a long way in just a few 
> short years. Unlocking a phone allows owners to put the device on 
> whatever carrier network they choose. For years, carriers have locked 
> down devices, allowing them only to connect to their own networks. The 
> move was designed to keep customers close and not see them stray to other 
> carriers.

> "We are pleased the FCC acknowledged the participating wireless 
> carriers met the deadlines to unlock their customers' devices per the 
> Consumer Code for Wireless Service," said Scott Bergmann, the CTIA's 
> vice president for regulatory affairs, in a statement. "We also remind 
> consumers that an unlocked device does not necessarily mean an 
> interoperable one since different carriers use different technologies and 
> spectrum bands."

> For customers, the inability to unlock handsets had been a nuisance. 
> Many consumers, seeking better network coverage or data plan pricing, 
> have wanted to be able to move to a different network without having 
> to buy a new device. An unlocked handset would allow that interchange 
> between, say, AT&T and T-Mobile networks. Locked devices force 
> customers to stick with their carrier networks and if they decide to 
> switch, to buy a new device on the other carrier.

> In 2013, the issue of unlocking hitting a tipping point when the 
> Libary of Congress held that the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act 
> (DMCA) banned American consumers from unlocking their devices without 
> the consent of their carriers. Critics took issue with the ruling, 
> which actually came down in
> 2012 but went into effect in 2013. Then in August 2014 came the 
> "Unlocking Consumer Choice and Wireless Competition Act," which 
> effectively made unlocking legal again.

> Under the CTIA's Consumer Code for Wireless Service that went into 
> effect Wednesday, carriers will have no choice but to remove locks on 
> devices owned by both postpaid and prepaid wireless users.

> On the postpaid side, carriers must unlock devices after a customer in 
> good standing has fulfilled "postpaid service contract, device 
> financing plan, or payment of applicable early termination fee." In 
> other words, those subscribers who get smartphones for less by paying 
> a subsidy at the beginning and paying in full over the life of a 
> contract, must have satisfied that payment covenant before they can be 
> allowed to unlock their device.

> On the prepaid side, things are bit simpler: carriers must, upon 
> request, unlock a handset "no later than one year after initial activation."

> All unlocking, regardless of the type of customer, must be completed 
> within two days of a request, and carriers are now required to inform 
> consumers of their policies.

> "Carriers that lock devices will clearly notify customers that their 
> devices are eligible for unlocking at the time when their devices are 
> eligible for unlocking or automatically unlock devices remotely when 
> devices are eligible for unlocking, without additional fee," the code 
> reads. "Carriers reserve the right to charge 
> non-customers/non-former-customers with a reasonable fee for unlocking 
> requests. Notice to prepaid customers may occur at point of sale, at 
> the time of eligibility, or through a clear and concise statement of policy 
> on the carrier's website."

> http://www.cnet.com/news/new-regulation-requires-us-carriers-to-unlock
> -user-
> phones/?tag=nl.e703&s_cid=e703&ttag=e703&ftag=CAD090e536



> --
> The following information is important for all members of the viphone 
> list. All new members to the this list are moderated by default. If 
> you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or 
> if you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the 
> owners or moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself.
> The archives for this list can be searched at 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/.
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "VIPhone" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/viphone.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
The following information is important for all members of the viphone list. All 
new members to the this list are moderated by default. If you have any 
questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a 
member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators 
directly rather than posting on the list itself. The archives for this list can 
be searched at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/viphone.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
The following information is important for all members of the viphone list. All 
new members to the this list are moderated by default. If you have any 
questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a 
member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators 
directly rather than posting on the list itself. The archives for this list can 
be searched at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/viphone.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to