I certainly agree about the current state of Bluetooth. With iOS 9 and my iPhone, it is horrible. There are weird volume issues among other things, along with the ridiculous latency, which instead of getting better with the new Bluetooth standard, has actually gotten worse. Rather than screw around trying to make something unnoticeably thinner, Apple needs to dig in and fix the problems that they keep not fixing as new iterations of software roll out.
Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 1, 2015, at 7:59 AM, cd <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don’t think you are in the minority. This would be a horrible thing as at > least for me I find the regular Bluetooth a nightmare with the latest IOS > update especially. Give me my corded headset any time! Yes this would truly > suck! > > Carla > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Jonathan Mosen > Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 7:49 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Apple, Don't Take my Headphone Jack Away > > Hi everyone, I waited a few days to see if this issue might be raised by > someone else. But I'll raise it here myself, because I'm not sure whether > Apple may be flying a kite here and seeing what reaction this idea gets. > > There's an unconfirmed rumour from a source that has in the past been > credible, that the next generation iPhone will not include a headphone jack, > so Apple can make the phone thinner. > I'm pasting a blog post that I wrote and published on this subject 72 hours > ago. Here goes. > > I like thin, lightweight technology, but it isn’t the only criterion that > determines what I use. If thin and light doesn’t give me the performance I > need, I’m happy to choose something heavier or bigger. > > When the iPhone 6 Plus came out, I bought one. Initially, it seemed > absolutely enormous, and I thought I’d never get used to it. Now I’m on the > 6s Plus and would never go back to a smaller iPhone. The battery life and the > bigger screen for Braille screen input make it the right choice for me. > > After being a MacBook Air user for three years, I recently bought a 15-inch > MacBook Pro with all the specs maxed out. It includes 16GB of RAM and 1TB > solid state storage. > > Compared to my MacBook Air, the Pro feels heavy and thick, and I’ve therefore > given it the nickname “The Big Kahuna”. But it fits in my backpack just fine > when I travel, it isn’t really that arduous to take places, and the thing is, > it goes like a rocket. I enjoy having OS X for a few apps and functions, but > Windows is still my primary operating system. With a laptop this fast and > powerful, I can run JAWS in a virtual machine with superb results, and still > tend to iMessages and FaceTime calls. > > Sometimes I pick up my old MacBook Air and think, “oy, what have I done? This > thing is so cute!” But the performance factor soon reminds me that I made the > right decision for my particular needs. > > There’s plenty of choice of form factor in the MacBook line now. If you want > to go ultra-portable, there’s the new 12-inch retina MacBook, which is just > adorably thin and light, with compromises to match. It sports a single USB > type C port, which is the only way both to connect peripherals to it and > charge it. And the keyboard is, to put it charitably, an acquired taste. > > So when it comes to Mac, Apple now has a line-up that can meet the needs of > the road warrior who wants something really light for a bit of word > processing, email and web surfing, all the way to someone who needs plenty of > grunt and is willing to lug it around. > > There is not so much flexibility in the iPhone stable, where there are > usually now two current models with similar specs but different screen sizes. > So when I read a rumour that Apple may dispense with the 3.5mm headphone jack > in iPhone 7 models, it had me concerned. > > Before I explain why, let me be clear that Apple itself has made no official > statement about the future of the headphone jack. It’s only a rumour. But I > read a lot of technology sources, and have come to know which sources tend to > be more reliable. The source of this story, the Japanese technology site Mac > Otakara, has a good track record. No news site that reports things like this > gets it right 100% of the time though. It’s also possible that Apple wants to > monitor customer reaction to the idea, by letting it leak. But there’s no > doubt that decisions as fundamental as this are being taken now, or probably > have already been taken. > > You can read an English summary of the story at Mac Rumours. > Even if the story is wrong, and I hope it is, I want to write a defence of > the headphone jack for those who think its loss wouldn’t be a big deal. Some > of us really, genuinely need it. > > The story suggests that the 3.5mm headphone jack will be dispensed with, > because it’s preventing Apple from making the iPhone thinner. If they removed > the jack, they could shave more than 1mm off the thickness of the phone. > > If this rumour is correct, Apple would probably include Earpods with a > Lightning connector, since specs for headphones that use the Lightning port > have been available since 2014. > > According to the story, the Lightning port would include a digital to > analogue converter, so you’d still be able to connect 3.5mm headphones. There > is no word in the story that this Lightning port would be in addition to the > one already on iPhones, implying that you’ll have one port for both charging > your device and listening to wired headphones or connecting the device to a > mixer. > > My first objection to this rumour is a philosophical one. 3.5mm headphone > jacks are ubiquitous. The standard is supported by a massive number of > manufacturers. It would be sad if Apple required its users to carry a > proprietary adapter, probably sold separately, to connect standard equipment > to their single proprietary port. But they’ve done this before. Even on my > maxed out MacBook Pro, I have to buy a special adapter just to connect to > wired Ethernet. > > My remaining concerns relate to functionality. As a hearing-aid wearer, I use > my iPhone with a cable between the headphone jack and my hearing aids about > 95% of the time. There’s no latency because it’s analogue all the way, and > since no Bluetooth is involved, it’s energy efficient in terms of hearing aid > battery usage. The Lightning to analogue adapter would be one additional > device to carry, use and potentially lose, and it would mean that I couldn’t > use my iPhone in the way that is optimal for me while I’m charging it. > There’s also the possibility that the digital to analogue converter may > introduce latency. That wouldn’t be important for most tasks, but it would be > detrimental to all VoiceOver users who use 3.5mm devices, not just hearing > aid wearers. > > But there’s always Bluetooth, and that’s the way the world is going, right? > There may be a few exceptions, but the majority of Bluetooth audio I’ve used > on iOS is laggy with VoiceOver, Apple’s built-in screen reader for blind > people like me, that I find it a frustrating, sub-optimal experience. > Streamers for hearing aid wearers often power down very quickly after > VoiceOver has stopped speaking, to save energy. This means that hearing aid > wearers who use VoiceOver with Bluetooth streamers often must cope with > missing the first second or two of what VoiceOver is saying, as the Bluetooth > streamer powers up after detecting audio. If you’re taking a phone call or > listening to music, that’s no big deal, but for a VoiceOver user, it’s not a > good experience. And Bluetooth streamers chew through hearing aid batteries > faster than an analogue connection, imposing additional costs on hearing aid > wearers. > > Taking hearing impairment out of the mix, there are many people who use the > 3.5mm jack, and want to do so while charging their device. Bonnie, for > example, has a pillow speaker, because she likes the radio on at night. It > plugs into her iPhone while it’s charging. > > We may be about to see a similar controversy with iPhone to the one that > greeted the new MacBook’s single USB C port and all the inconveniences that > go with that. When that controversy was at its peak, proponents said that > Apple often likes to move the tech agenda forward, and that they’re uniquely > positioned to do that by making “bold” decisions like this. Sorry, I don’t > consider a single port for peripherals and charging a bold decision. It’s > just a pain. If you want to use multiple devices, you have to buy some sort > of hub, which detracts from the convenience of having an all-in-one device. > > I realise that as a VoiceOver user with a hearing impairment passionate about > getting the most optimal audio experience, I’m a minority within a minority. > But if this rumour proves to be true, it will be my queue to seriously > examine other mobile options. I really don’t want a phone one more millimetre > thinner, when it’s going to create an experience for me that would be poorer. > > > Jonathan Mosen > Mosen Consulting > Blindness technology eBooks, tutorials and training > http://Mosen.org > > -- > The following information is important for all members of the V iPhone list. > > If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if > you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or > moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself. > > Your V iPhone list moderator is Mark Taylor and your owner is Cara Quinn - > you can reach Cara at [email protected] > > The archives for this list can be searched at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "VIPhone" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/viphone. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- > The following information is important for all members of the V iPhone list. > > If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if > you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or > moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself. > > Your V iPhone list moderator is Mark Taylor and your owner is Cara Quinn - > you can reach Cara at [email protected] > > The archives for this list can be searched at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "VIPhone" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/viphone. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- The following information is important for all members of the V iPhone list. If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself. Your V iPhone list moderator is Mark Taylor and your owner is Cara Quinn - you can reach Cara at [email protected] The archives for this list can be searched at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "VIPhone" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/viphone. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
