You know I wonder when both sides will opt to sit down and end this pissing contest that only helps lawyers get rich. :) I suspect if both sides could come together they could both benefit. ALthough I guess all this squabbling does keep things interesting.
On Sep 14, 2012, at 9:12 PM, Raul A. Gallegos <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess Apple is off the hook. Read below. > > http://appleinsider.com/articles/12/09/14/us_itc_judge_rules_apple_does_not_violate_samsung_patents > > -- > Raul A. Gallegos > "The trouble with being punctual is that nobody's there to appreciate it." - > Franklin P. Jones > Home Page: http://raulgallegos.com > Twitter: https://twitter.com/rau47 > Facebook: http://facebook.com/rau47 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone" Google > Group. > To search the VIPhone public archive, visit > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone" Google Group. To search the VIPhone public archive, visit http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en.
