I read a post at iPhone In Canada that the new maps app is receiving widespan criticism from all sides. Many streets are missing, listed as being much further than they actually are and in many cases there are points of interest (such as restaurants or retail stores) that have been shut down for years being listed still.
For as many things as apple gets right, it sounds like they really dropped the ball with this one. Here's a link to the post: http://www.iphoneincanada.ca/apple-software/apple-faces-criticism-over-omissions-errors-in-new-maps-poll/ Sounds like they're on the case though. Here's an article that was just posted about them working on these issues: http://www.iphoneincanada.ca/iphone-news/apple-states-maps-team-is-under-lockdown-to-fix-issues/ -Marc On 9/20/12, Kawal Gucukoglu <[email protected]> wrote: > I remember last year when Apple were talking about IOS six, they said that > they would not deal in making maps for visually people yet as for now they > were going to leave that to third parties. Thanks Mark for your report. I > think we just have to wait for a couple more years before Apple do make > something reverlutionary for people with all disabilities. I'm sure that > Apple are aware that people want something like what we have on the Treker > breeze. As a side note, I have noticed a lot of people are selling the > Breeze. I think that people are waiting to get these maps to hope that they > can use them in the way that Mark wants to use them. They will be > disappointed. Good things happen when one is patient. > > Kind regards, > > Kawal. > > P.s. Sorry for the spelling but it's late here and now my mind is beginning > not to write sense. > On 20 Sep 2012, at 23:35, M. Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello Everyone, >> >> NOTE 1: >> I just returned from over 90 minutes of using the iOS 6.0 Maps App, via >> VoiceOver, on my iPhone 4 S. I am extremely tired and uncomfortable as >> today is a particularly hot day here in southern California. Normally, I >> would post my results after a rest but want to report while the >> experience >> is still fresh in my mind. So, if the following comes across as curt, >> please accept my apology; I just want to get the facts, as I experienced >> them, to you. >> >> NOTE 2: >> Before heading out the door, I made sure my iPHone reported 100% battery >> level. I turned my WiFi off and rebooted the phone for good measure. >> >> NOTE 3: >> During the entire experience, my phone reported that I had a 4G >> connection. >> This connection was never lost as I live in a part of town that, for >> better >> or worse, is replete with A T & T Wireless cell towers. >> >> NOTE 4: >> I only experimented with creating and using walking directions, not >> driving >> directions. >> >> NOTE 5: >> I did not use any Bluetooth connected accessories but, rather, only the >> included Apple headset that ships with the 4 S. >> >> NOTE 6: >> My initial positive test results, yesterday, were based on the fact that >> Siri correctly announced my approach to a street at the beginning of a >> short >> route. >> >> NOTE 7: >> While it is not my intention to draw comparisons between the iOS 6.0 Maps >> App and the Trekker Breeze, I will refer to the Breeze if for no other >> reason than to informs those who may not know, that such features exist in >> a >> GPS solution designed for the blind and low vision. >> >> Now that all that is out of the way let's get to it, shall we? >> >> 1. >> I live about a quarter of a mile from the nearest street that is mapped. >> As >> a result, when using my current location as the starting point, I could >> only >> create a route when standing in a certain position in my driveway. In >> order >> to consistently create a route, I had to walk up to the street that is >> mapped. While this is not a deal breaker, by any means, Trekker can >> provide >> off-map guidance. >> >> 2. >> My first experiment was to not create a route but, instead, set tracking >> to >> on plus headings and then just walk down the street. While Maps, as I >> will >> refer to it from this point forward, reported that I was approaching an >> intersection, it did not do so consistently. In fact, it inconsistently >> listed some streets while omitting others. I should also let you know >> that >> the accuracy of the street name announcements were dismal, at best. That >> is >> to say, as a low vision person, I could see the intersections and compare >> what I saw to when information was reported. It appeared to me that the >> longer I walked, the more inaccurate and/or sluggish Maps became. Please >> note that I conducted some experiments multiple times in order to discern >> any patterns. >> >> NOTE 8: >> Just in case you're wondering, there were no tall building, clouds, or >> any >> kind of obstructions blocking my view of the sky. >> >> NOTE 9: >> The compass, during all my experiments, was dead on. It was perfectly >> accurate and the most responsive. >> >> 3. >> Next, I created several walking routes. I deliberately chose >> destinations >> by which one may only travel in one direction. That is to say, all of >> the >> streets, along the route, dead-end into others. To my astonishment, Maps >> got them all wrong. In one test, the directions were reversed. For >> example >> instructing me to turn left when I could only turn right. In another >> experiment, it listed streets that were simply not there. >> >> 4. >> Whenever I attempted to view the list of directions, which by the way did >> not dynamically update, tracking would switch to off. This was >> maddening, >> to put it nicely. >> >> 5. >> When reporting my current location, compass headings notwithstanding, the >> only thing Maps consistently got right was the city. Sometimes it >> reported >> the correct street but not enough to trust, were I totally blind and in >> an >> unfamiliar environment. >> >> 6. >> Even though I have my screen brightness set to only 40%, at the end of >> the >> 90 minutes of walking, my battery level was 62%. >> >> In conclusion, based on what I experienced today, I would not recommend >> Maps >> as a GPS walking navigation solution for the blind and low vision on >> iPhone >> 4 S. It will be interesting to see how iPHone 5 does in comparison. >> >> I hope some of you find this report useful. As is always the case, your >> mileage may vary. >> >> Making a Joyful Noise, >> >> Mark >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone" >> Google Group. >> To search the VIPhone public archive, visit >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en. >> >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone" Google > Group. > To search the VIPhone public archive, visit > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en. > > > -- “There is no shame in being who you are. There’s only shame in not going down swinging to protect it” -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone" Google Group. To search the VIPhone public archive, visit http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en.
