Below is a very long article, but easier to read this way than on the web site:


For Apple, Accessibility Awareness Happens All Year Long
Photo of Steven Aquino
Steven Aquino
Contributor
Diversity & Inclusion
Steven covers accessibility and assistive technology.
The blue accessibility icon on a blue background, with eyes, an ear, and a hand 
around APPLE
May is Accessibility Awareness Month.
As I reported last week for iMore, Apple is recognizing the occasion with a 
slew of minor yet notable updates to its various properties-Apple Store 
editorial, Apple Support, and more. Celebrating Accessibility Awareness Month 
is something the company has done for several years, so this year is no 
different. Like privacy, Apple's commitment to prioritizing assistive 
technology is institutional; to paraphrase Kendrick Lamar, Apple got 
accessibility in their DNA. I've heard stories about how former iOS boss Scott 
Forstall pushed internally for the inclusion of accessibility features into 
what was then known as iPhone OS. The first batch-VoiceOver, Zoom, Mono Audio, 
and White-on-Black- made their debut in 2009 with the iPhone 3GS. There is a 
codified way of doing business at Apple, and accessibility plays a big role. 
Accessibility is part and parcel of the design process for new products and 
initiatives within Apple Park. It's my understanding, according to multiple 
sources familiar with the matter, accessibility is on the ground floor of 
considerations when Apple starts development of any product.
While it's certainly right to laud Apple for recognizing Accessibility 
Awareness Month, the truth is recognizing accessibility is a continuous project 
for the company that extends beyond one month or one day. Accessibility 
awareness is a 365-day affair at Apple. From emoji and WWDC to media events and 
diversity reports, the company tries hard to ensure people with disabilities 
are properly represented in just about everything associated with Apple.
With this im mind, and with Global Accessibility Awareness Day (GAAD) coming 
next Thursday, May 21, as of this writing, here are two areas in which 
accessibility is abstractly prevalent throughout Apple's software and services.
Accessibility Makes The Front Page
One of the under-the-radar changes made to iOS 13 (and iPadOS and watchOS 6) 
was the Accessibility settings were moved from the General section of Settings 
to the front page. To borrow a journalistic expression, the fact Accessibility 
went "above the fold" is not merely a change for convenience's sake. It is 
hugely symbolic-and a reflection of Apple's institutional empathy for disabled 
people. That Accessibility is on the main page, occupying the same space as 
other critical system settings, sends a subtle yet powerful message that 
accessibility matters. Not only to users like me with medically-sanctioned 
conditions, but to every user. Apple is oft to remind people that accessibility 
features are relevant to anyone, regardless of ability. While these features 
will (and should) always remain targeted at people such as myself, good 
software is useful to everyone. You need not have a bonafide visual impairment 
to appreciate Dynamic Type, for example. (Which is all the more reason 
third-party developers should support the API in their apps.)
In a broader sociocultural context, that Accessibility is on the main page is 
important. Again, the symbolism is significant. While you certainly could 
fairly ask why it wasn't done sooner, the fact Apple did this at all speaks 
volumes about how they value disabled people. Apple is literally putting the 
needs of people with disabilities front and center; it's a meaningful gesture 
that goes beyond literal access. By contrast, it annoys me greatly to see news 
articles and YouTube videos refer to accessibility options as "hidden"-the 
implication being said features are deliberately buried deep in the bowels of 
the operating system by an engineer gone rogue, never to be discovered.
As I wrote in my piece on Apple and disability discount pricing, ableism 
pervades society just as much as racism and sexism, yet is talked about far 
less. Any logical, good-hearted person will agree people with disabilities and 
our plights matter, but it oftentimes feels like mostly lip service in the 
grand scheme. As I wrote to conclude the aforementioned piece:
Even amidst the steady drumbeat of championing diversity and inclusion, 
supporters leave out disabled people more often than not. We're relegated to 
patronizing, feel-good, human interest story status.
As such, Apple's decision to move the Accessibility menu stands to challenge 
those gee-whiz sentiments. It's yet another example of the company saying 
people with disabilities exist and their needs are important and deserving of 
accommodation.
Disabled people are just as marginalized and underrepresented as women, people 
of color, and the LGBT community. And that's not even getting into the 
intersectionality of disabled people with those other groups. As a disabled 
person-setting aside my job as a reporter-it means something to me that the 
biggest, richest company on the planet strives to make us substantial, 
first-class citizens.
Lest you think I'm being overly dramatic about ableism, consider this personal 
anecdote: All my life, I've had a disabled parking placard. Although my 
cerebral palsy is much milder than some cases, it still very much affects me to 
the point that I need close parking. Yet I still get a lot of "Why are you 
parking so close? You don't look disabled!" questions by strangers. Such 
comments exemplify ableist privilege.
So yes, moving Accessibility means a great deal to me and surely to others.
App Store Editorial Features
In July 2017, a month after Apple announced the top-to-bottom revamp of the iOS 
App Store, I wrote a story for iMore wherein I detailed how the App Store could 
"push accessibility forward." Almost three years later, my hypothesis proved 
correct.
Look no further than my reporting on Apple's Accessibility Awareness Month 
plans for this year for proof. There is a collection of apps updated with a few 
new titles that appeared last Thursday on the Today tab. Likewise, there have 
been other stories featuring apps that "give back", as well as collections of 
apps that support system features such as VoiceOver.
The sharper focus on editorial content is a shrewd business move for Apple, as 
it makes the App Store more of a destination-fattening that Services line-after 
years of being sterilely transactional. But it's also beneficial for users: 
better for discovering new apps, but also better for representation.
The reasoning for this is in the same vein as giving the Accessibility menu 
more prime real estate. It's about exposure-exposure for a marginalized 
community and for the tools they use. It's not something Apple needs to do 
every single day, but as I argued in my 2017 piece, the App Store is another 
avenue in which Apple can uniquely leverage the platform's massive reach. There 
are hundreds of millions of iOS users worldwide-Mac users too, for that 
matter-and chances are high that a litany of eyeballs are seeing Apple promote 
the innovative ways in which disabled people use their iPhones, iPads, and 
MacBooks.
As with the Accessibility menu move, this doesn't lack in significance. The App 
Store editorial team doesn't need to run these stories, but they do.
The Elephant-Sized Caveat
I am fully aware Apple does not prioritize accessibility, in any form, solely 
out of the goodness of their collective heart. Apple does not operate purely on 
altruism; they're a big, fat corporation that stands to make money. Lots of it. 
Especially in context of the App Store, it's ultimately a marketing arm. The 
whole value proposition is the richness of apps make iOS devices and the 
platform overall more attractive to users-which, in turn, makes the stickiness 
of the Apple ecosystem that much stickier. This is why WWDC is such a big deal 
for the company: providing richer development tools to developers makes for 
more capable devices and a better App Store. So it goes.
I get it. Apple is a business. They do what they do to "enrich people's lives," 
as Tim Cook is wont to say on stage, but the reality is they also do it to make 
money.
it's also worth noting that Apple is not beyond reproach, even when it comes to 
accessibility. As with everything in life, there's always room to get better. 
I'm simply trying to illustrate how their strategic choices affect more than 
the bottom line or marketing or the utilitarian aspects of the products they 
create.
The Bottom Line
Apple is a Goliath of industry that endeavors to make as much coin as possible. 
Being a publicly-traded company, their shareholders and Wall Street demand it. 
And of course, the SEC requires them to report their earnings each quarter At 
the same time, however, it is fair (and accurate) to point out the positive 
aspects of the company's business. Their empathetic nature is different, dare I 
say refreshing, amongst its ilk of multi-billion dollar, multi-national 
mega-corporations. Contrary to society's outlook, Apple's views on people with 
disabilities is decidedly not lip service. Tim Cook talks the talk and the 
company walks the walk when it comes to supporting people with disabilities. 
Apple is a beacon of light on an otherwise dreary situation. In Silicon Valley, 
they are Secretariat at the Belmont.
They set a standard for others, just as they did with the iPhone in 2007. Most 
people don't think of creating assistive technology as innovative, but it 
really is. Same goes for software quality-people can (and do!) criticize Apple 
for a perceived lack of high quality software in recent years, but I'd contend 
the accessibility features are a sign they still know their craft. These 
features are mission-critical to so many that improve in breadth and depth year 
in and year out. My peers in the Apple pundit racket know the iPhone not 
shipping on time every fall isn't a viable option. I have no inside knowledge 
to confirm this, but would venture to say, software-wise, accessibility is to 
the iPhone as far as priorities are concerned. It's non-trivial work that's 
gotta ship.
As someone with disabilities, this care towards and push for accessibility 
awareness means something to me. It's equally, if not more, important than the 
tech itself. Conquering ableism is an Everest-sized issue that's beyond even 
Apple's (or any one entity's) ken-but their eagerness to combat it in their own 
ways is endearing and part of what differentiates them from other companies, 
technology or not. In this pandemic-riddled world where mainstream media 
coverage of how the coronavirus affects disabled people is slim to none, 
there's comfort to be taken in how Apple has included special education in 
their homeschooling resource kit.
Like I wrote at the outset, Apple's work isn't limited to a single month or 
day. It goes year-round.
Sign up for the Forbes (DI)SCUSS weekly newsletter from Diversity & Inclusion 
Reporter Ruth Umoh.
Go to the page where this article appears to sign up:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevenaquino/2020/05/12/for-apple-accessibility-awareness-happens-all-year-long/#735b85d8116e

Check out my Website: https://www.stevenaquino.co/

Photo of Steven Aquino
Steven Aquino
Steven is a freelance tech journalist based in San Francisco, CA. He covers all 
things accessibility. What makes his coverage unique is the fact he is
 disabled-



Richard
"There's a nap for that." - an anonymous cat in a window in Portland, Oregon.


-- 
The following information is important for all members of the V iPhone list.

If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you 
feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or 
moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself.

Your V iPhone list moderator is Mark Taylor.  Mark can be reached at:  
[email protected].  Your list owner is Cara Quinn - you can reach Cara at 
[email protected]

The archives for this list can be searched at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/viphone/MWHPR1701MB1901C35C3567007BA2CDD0F4B7BF0%40MWHPR1701MB1901.namprd17.prod.outlook.com.

Reply via email to