If a similar issue were to come up again I would again resolutely be "short
sighted" and vote "NO!" It doesn't bother me to be labeled "short sighted"
because at that time Microsoft had shown no serious intention to be
concerned about accessibility until the State of Massachusetts had
implemented a policy to not use Microsoft products until MS straightened out
it's act. And let's not forget that Microsoft is a highly "proprietary"
outfit.
----------------
Holland's Man, Bill
- "A hospital bed is a parked taxi with the meter running."
- Julius Henry (Groucho) Marx, 1890 - 1977
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone" Google
Group.
To search the VIPhone public archive, visit
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en.
