于 2013/4/20 3:09, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues 写道:
Well, in fact it was all tabs :) I've corrected your patch to use tabs.

I did apply all your 5 bug fixes Mike, thank you very much for all these useful patches!

Why I can't see in the git tree now? and I'm sure it has in the tree before.
There is something wrong with the github?

Thanks
Mike

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 14:39 +0800, Mike Qiu wrote:
    > 于 2013/4/19 14:06, Feng Yang 写道:
    > > On 04/19/2013 09:55 AM, Mike Qiu wrote:
    > >> 于 2013/4/18 13:33, Feng Yang 写道:
    > >>> On 04/17/2013 07:38 PM, Mike Qiu wrote:
    > >>>> From: Mike Qiu <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    > >>>>
    > >>>> The name of the clock on Power guest is "timebase" which is
    > >>>> different from it counterpart in x86 "kvm-clock"
    > >>>>
    > >>>> To makes it can work in both Power and x86 guest, add the
    > >>>> platform check.
    > >>>>
    > >>>> Signed-off-by: Mike Qiu <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    > >>>> ---
    > >>>> shared/deps/test_clock_getres/test_clock_getres.c | 7 ++++++-
    > >>>> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
    > >>>>
    > >>>> diff --git a/shared/deps/test_clock_getres/test_clock_getres.c
    > >>>> b/shared/deps/test_clock_getres/test_clock_getres.c
    > >>>> index 81d3b9c..986276a 100644
    > >>>> --- a/shared/deps/test_clock_getres/test_clock_getres.c
    > >>>> +++ b/shared/deps/test_clock_getres/test_clock_getres.c
    > >>>> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
    > >>>> /*
    > >>>> - * Test clock resolution for KVM guests that have kvm-clock as
    > >>>> clock source
    > >>>> + * Test clock resolution for KVM guests that have kvm-clock or
    > >>>> timebase
    > >>>> + * as clock source
    > >>>> *
    > >>>> * Copyright (c) 2010 Red Hat, Inc
    > >>>> * Author: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    > >>>> @@ -38,7 +39,11 @@ int main(void) {
    > >>>> sscanf(line, "%s", &clocksource);
    > >>>> }
    > >>>> fclose(fr);
    > >>>> +#if defined(__powerpc64__)
    > >>>> + if (!strncmp(clocksource, "timebase", strlen("timebase"))) {
    > >>>> +#else
    > >>>> if (!strncmp(clocksource, "kvm-clock", strlen("kvm-clock"))) {
    > >>>> +#endif
    > >>> This patch works.
    > >>> But both "Tab" and four space are used in this patch.
    > >> OK, I should use tab only.... and then shall I resend for V2
    for you
    > >> convert it?
    > > Actually I do not know why tab used in that file.
    > Use tap in C code is very normal

    No doubt it is normal, but better to decide (or the file uses all
    spaces, or all tabs). Given that I wrote the original file using all
    spaces, better to keep the convention.


    _______________________________________________
    Virt-test-devel mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-test-devel




--
Lucas

_______________________________________________
Virt-test-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-test-devel

Reply via email to