On 07/26/2013 03:18 PM, Ademar de Souza Reis Jr. wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:51:23PM +0200, Lukáš Doktor wrote:
>> Dne 25.7.2013 21:52, Cleber Rosa napsal(a):> On 07/25/2013 04:41 PM,
>> Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
> (Versioning could be simple: define __version__{"major","minor"}
> in the module. major would be incremented when compatibility is
> broken and minor when bugs are fixed or new stuff is added --
> AFAIK there's no consensus/standard for it in python yet).
>
> Anyway, +1 for virttest.staging, I think it's a good idea.
>
> Cheers.
> - Ademar
>
Isn't the autotest.utils module implemented as a kind of "mixin". What
about extending that mechanism further? Toss in versioning, and it
would allow virt-test updates to extend the namespace with new/fixed
code, and callers to check they're getting a supported version.
--
Chris Evich, RHCA, RHCE, RHCDS, RHCSS
Quality Assurance Engineer
e-mail: cevich + `@' + redhat.com o: 1-888-RED-HAT1 x44214
_______________________________________________
Virt-test-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-test-devel
