On 14 August 2010 00:16, Jamin W. Collins <[email protected]> wrote: > If possible I'd like to get some opinions on the following bug report: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623188 > > Obviously, I believe that virt-manager should be defaulting to disabling > caching for disks backed by raw volumes as qemu suggests. There is a huge > performance difference in doing so. AFAIK, there is no difference, in terms > of risk, between no cache and Writethrough. > > I don't quite get Daniel's response and subsequent closing the bug report > indicating that it's a policy decision for virt-manager and the like. I > filed the report where virt-manager's web site indicated the report should > be filed. This is very likely because you filed against the libvirt product in bugzilla and not virt-manager, and it was not clear from context that you meant virt-manager. If it says that you should do that on the webpage, please state where so it can be fixed. I suggest you change the product to virt-manager and reopen.
-- Regards Jon Nordby - www.jonnor.com _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
