On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:47:06AM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > On 04/14/2011 10:22 PM, Cole Robinson wrote: > >On 04/14/2011 02:05 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > >>The goal of the virtlib library is to extract from Virt Manager and > >>Virt Manager TUI the shared business logic and package it separately > >>as a reusable library of code. > >> > > > >Just to be clear, a reusable _private_ library of code for tools in the > >virt-manager umbrella. There isn't any benefit to making this library > >public at the moment. As far as the code is concerned I assume it > >shouldn't make a difference (that said I haven't looked at the code yet). > > Wouldn't virtmanagerlib be a more appropriate name? If this ever > goes public I imagine the names virtlib vs. libvirt will cause a lot > of confusion in discussions.
I had gone back and forth on ideas for what to name the libraries. I'm open to better naming for it: this was a first stab placeholder. Though I don't see it being confused with libvirt at all. -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
pgpycv4ckCMDp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
