On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 04:10:44PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Christophe Fergeau <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 03:50:19PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Christophe Fergeau > >> > Hmm this also means the OSINFO_LIVE/OSINFO_INSTALLER properties are no > >> > longer that useful, we can go from ID to database entry and get these > >> > properties from there. I'm pointing this out since iirc the less things > >> > we > >> > stick in udev, the better. > >> > >> Perhaps but then we'll need to waste some time in re-searching for > >> media/os that has already been searched for by another entitiy. > > > > I don't think this search will be done so often that the extra search > > matters > > Its also about the amount of time/resources it'll take to do search. > I imagine that at some point our database will become quite big enough > to care about this performance penalty.
Or some of the database might not be local - we could be looking up against database files over HTTP. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
