On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Christophe Fergeau <[email protected]> wrote:
> ACK to the patch apart from these cosmetic issues. There are still > dozens of calls to g_signal_connect in the codebase after this patch, > why are these special? > There was already a mix of both. No particular reason except that virt_viewer_signal_connect_object() is easier to deal with when handler callback is a object. I was tracking memory issues with Spice, I didn't see the need to replace it elsewhere. -- Marc-André Lureau
_______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
