On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Christophe Fergeau <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, I beg to disagree on the 'easy to read' part as I would not have > split > it if I had found it that easy to read ;) > I agree, the original code is not so easy to read, the rewritten version however is. > "fairly small" and "easy to read" are really secondary to "one change by > patch", which I don't think the initial patch achieved. > It is a rewrite, really no steps involved when I did it, it's hard to come up with steps which I think are artificial, but as I said, let's go with your 3 patches then -- Marc-André Lureau
_______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
