Hey,
Same comment as on the last patch regarding the lack of an explanation
of what we are trying to achieve with this patch/why we need it.
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 06:53:49PM -0300, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
> diff --git a/src/ovirt-foreign-menu.c b/src/ovirt-foreign-menu.c
> index 32c6452..6403a0b 100644
> --- a/src/ovirt-foreign-menu.c
> +++ b/src/ovirt-foreign-menu.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>
> #include "ovirt-foreign-menu.h"
> #include "virt-viewer-util.h"
> +#include "glib-compat.h"
>
> typedef enum {
> STATE_0,
> @@ -612,6 +613,23 @@ static void
> ovirt_foreign_menu_fetch_vm_cdrom_async(OvirtForeignMenu *menu,
> }
>
>
> +static gboolean storage_domain_active_for_data_center(OvirtStorageDomain
> *domain,
> + OvirtDataCenter
> *data_center)
I find this a bit misleading, the 'active' part was tested with
if (state != OVIRT_STORAGE_DOMAIN_STATE_ACTIVE) {
continue;
}
Maybe storage_domain_is_attached_to_data_center() instead?
Apart from this, looks good to me.
Christophe
_______________________________________________
virt-tools-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
