On 10/23/2012 05:54 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > NM_Controlled=0 for host-box eth0, eth1. > > > # service network restart > Restarting network (via systemctl): [ OK ] > [root@testvm ~]# brctl show > bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces > virbr0 8000.525400211c46 yes virbr0-nic > vnet0 > vnet1 > > > default.xml > <network> > <name>default</name> > <uuid>6fc62803-d768-4f28-9aaf-6c1798d97dff</uuid> > <bridge name="virbr0" /> > <forward/> > <ip address="192.168.1.1" netmask="255.255.255.0"> > <dhcp> > <range start="192.168.1.10" end="192.168.1.20" /> > </dhcp> > </ip> > </network> > > There seemt to be no connection between, > the virt-network and the physical though: > nat --> eth1 > > is in virt-manager. > The two running guests F17+testing, > are set up with NIC: default nat to eth1 >
Does restarting libvirtd make any difference? If something reloaded firewall rules while libvirtd is running, virtual networks will stop working. - Cole _______________________________________________ virt mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/virt
