> -----Original Message----- > From: Kashyap Chamarthy [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 8:51 AM > To: Shergill, Gurinder > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [fedora-virt] virsh output discrepancy with vol-list > > [Please wrap lines in your email client. Long lines are a bit hard to > read.] > > >>> I am using Fedora 17. > >> > >> Version of libvirt ? > > > > $ rpm -qa | grep libvirt > > libvirt-daemon-0.9.11.9-1.fc17.x86_64 > > libvirt-python-0.9.11.9-1.fc17.x86_64 > > libvirt-daemon-config-network-0.9.11.9-1.fc17.x86_64 > > libvirt-client-0.9.11.9-1.fc17.x86_64 > > libvirt-daemon-qemu-0.9.11.9-1.fc17.x86_64 > > libvirt-0.9.11.9-1.fc17.x86_64 > > libvirt-daemon-config-nwfilter-0.9.11.9-1.fc17.x86_64 > > That's a little old. Can you please try w/ libvirt-daemon-kvm-1.0.4- > 1.fc18.x86_64
Okay. Will move to F18 and try. > > If some odd error hits me, I try, in that order: > - pull up virt-preview to test latests pkgs > - Info on enabling it - > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Virtualization_Preview_Repository > > - if the above fails, build qemu & libvirt from upstream git, if you > can still reproduce, file a bz with clear details/reproducer. > > > > >> > >> I'm using this version & I can't reproduce it -- libvirt-1.0.4- > >> 1.fc18.x86_64 > > > > The issue doesn't happen all the time or right away. I am working on > benchmarking various KVM storage I/O options, for this I routinely > create/destroy guests, and after a while I'll notice this discrepancy. > > If I were you, doing bench-marking, I'd try with newest available packages > of kernel, qemu, libvirt. I agree, however, I am trying to find the right balance between stability and newest available packages. That said, point taken -- I'll move to F18, and try out the preview repos. > > Hope that helps. Yeap. Thanks, Sunny _______________________________________________ virt mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/virt
