On 04/13/2013 10:25 PM, Shergill, Gurinder wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Cole Robinson [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 3:47 PM >> To: Shergill, Gurinder >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [fedora-virt] virsh output discrepancy with vol-list >> >> On 04/10/2013 11:06 PM, Shergill, Gurinder wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am seeing following discrepancy with virsh output for volume list, >> which goes away when I restart the libvirtd daemon. >>> >>> Here virsh shows 4 volumes. Also, notice that first 2 volumes are >> duplicates. >>> >>> $ virsh vol-list --pool default >>> Name Path >>> ----------------------------------------- >>> crab.vol.0.img /var/lib/libvirt/images/crab.vol.0.img >>> crab.vol.0.img /var/lib/libvirt/images/crab.vol.0.img >>> fish.vol.0.img /var/lib/libvirt/images/fish.vol.0.img >>> fish.vol.1.img /var/lib/libvirt/images/fish.vol.1.img >>> >>> However, none of the above volumes currently exist (as I had just >> deleted them using, again, using virsh). >>> >>> $ ll /var/lib/libvirt/images/ >>> total 0 >>> >>> Now, I restart libvirt. And, after that virsh output is fine. >>> >>> $ virsh vol-list --pool default >>> Name Path >>> ----------------------------------------- >>> >>> Any idea what is going on here ? Is this a known issue ? >>> >> >> When you delete files behind libvirt's back, it doesn't notice. > > Although, in my case, I used "virsh vol-delete" and did not go behind > libvirt. And, the last instance I reported, issue happened without anything > being deleted. > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/virt/2013-April/003637.html
Hmm, sorry, must have misread. > >> You need to do >> >> virsh vol-refresh default > > Good to know. > Man I really butchered this mail :) The correct command is actually virsh pool-refresh default - Cole _______________________________________________ virt mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/virt
