What are the values for the bridge-nf-call-* proc settings on your system?

[root@nexus ~]# ls -l /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-*
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 7. Aug 18:47 /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-arptables -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 7. Aug 18:47 /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-ip6tables -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 7. Aug 18:47 /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables

The bridge traffic probably gets firewalled. I see an "ACCEPT" rule with source 192.168.122.0/24 so if you are using this network for a guest then that would exlain why you can access the outside world but cannot ping the VM's from elsewhere. Try to set the above three settings to 0 and test again.

Regards,
  Dennis

On 07.08.2013 18:26, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
Currently, I have the following (defaults):
##############
# iptables --list --numeric
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination
ACCEPT     udp  --  0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0            udp dpt:53
ACCEPT     tcp  --  0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0            tcp dpt:53
ACCEPT     udp  --  0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0            udp dpt:67
ACCEPT     tcp  --  0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0            tcp dpt:67

Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination
ACCEPT     all  --  0.0.0.0/0            192.168.122.0/24     ctstate
RELATED,ESTABLISHED
ACCEPT     all  --  192.168.122.0/24     0.0.0.0/0
ACCEPT     all  --  0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0
REJECT     all  --  0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0
reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
REJECT     all  --  0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0
reject-with icmp-port-unreachable

Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination
################

This is identical to what I see on a Fedora16 host where the VMs are
accessible over the network.  What kind of rule would you suggest I
add?



On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Daniel Sanabria <sanabri...@gmail.com> wrote:
can you share your iptables config (iptables --list --numeric)?

make sure you have a forward rule that matches when the physical device is
bridge.

Cheers,

Daniel


On 7 August 2013 06:19, Udayendu Sekhar kar <udayendu....@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi there,

I am using Fedora 19 and configured the bridge when my "NetworkManager" is
enabled. I am configuring the VPN through "NetworkManager", so I have to
keep it on. Here is the configuration from my test system which is working
absolutely fine.


===========
# brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
br0 0080.5c260a8373dd no em1
virbr0 8000.5254004f366e yes virbr0-nic

# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em1
# Generated by dracut initrd
DEVICE="em1"
ONBOOT=yes
UUID="61632098-7161-42da-b97f-9e60148f589c"
BOOTPROTO="dhcp"
HWADDR="xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx"
TYPE=Ethernet
NAME="em1"
BRIDGE="br0"

# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0
DEVICE="br0"
BOOTPROTO="dhcp"
TYPE="Bridge"
HWADDR="xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx"
MTU=9000
ONBOOT="yes"


# systemctl status NetworkManager.service
NetworkManager.service - Network Manager
    Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/NetworkManager.service;
enabled)
    Active: active (running) since Wed 2013-08-07 10:21:41 IST; 15min ago
  Main PID: 736 (NetworkManager)
    CGroup: name=systemd:/system/NetworkManager.service
            ├─ 736 /usr/sbin/NetworkManager --no-daemon
            └─1165 /sbin/dhclient -d -sf /usr/libexec/nm-dhcp-client.action
-pf /var/run/dhclient-br0.pid -lf
/var/lib/NetworkManager/dhclient-d2d68553-f97e-7549-7a26-b34a26f29318-br0.lease
-cf /var/lib/Ne...

Aug 07 10:21:56 fedora.virt NetworkManager[736]: <info>   domain search
'pnq.redhat.com.'
Aug 07 10:21:56 fedora.virt NetworkManager[736]: <info>   domain search
'redhat.com.'
Aug 07 10:21:56 fedora.virt NetworkManager[736]: <info> Activation (br0)
Stage 5 of 5 (IPv4 Configure Commit) scheduled...
Aug 07 10:21:56 fedora.virt NetworkManager[736]: <info> Activation (br0)
Stage 5 of 5 (IPv4 Commit) started...
Aug 07 10:21:57 fedora.virt NetworkManager[736]: <info> (br0): device
state change: ip-config -> secondaries (reason 'none') [70 90 0]
Aug 07 10:21:57 fedora.virt NetworkManager[736]: <info> Activation (br0)
Stage 5 of 5 (IPv4 Commit) complete.
Aug 07 10:21:57 fedora.virt NetworkManager[736]: <info> (br0): device
state change: secondaries -> activated (reason 'none') [90 100 0]
Aug 07 10:21:57 fedora.virt NetworkManager[736]: <info> Policy set 'Bridge
br0' (br0) as default for IPv4 routing and DNS.
Aug 07 10:21:57 fedora.virt NetworkManager[736]: <info> Activation (br0)
successful, device activated.
============

This configuration will help you to configure the bridge interface over
your em1 device while NetworkManager is on and also you can use the
NetworkManager to configure the VPN.


Thanks,
Uday !







On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Lonni J Friedman <netll...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Greetings,
I'm attempting to get several virtual machines setup on a Fedora19
host system, with the traditional bridge network devices (br0, br1,
etc).   I've done this many times before with older versions of Fedora
(16, 14, etc), and it just works.  However, for reasons that I cannot
figure out, the bridge doesn't seem to be working in Fedora19.  While
I can successfully connect to the outside world (local network +
internet) from inside a VM, nothing can communicate with the VM from
outside (local network).  I'm referring to something as trivial as
pinging.  From inside the VM, I can ping anything successfully (0%
packet loss).  However, from outside the VM (on the host, or any other
system on the same network), I see 100% packet loss when pinging the
IP address of the VM.

My first question is simply, does anyone else have this working
successfully in F19?  And if so, what steps did you need to follow?

I'm not using NetworkManager at all, its all the network service.
There are no firewalls involved anywhere (iptables & firewall services
are currently disabled).  Here's the current host configuration:

     # brctl show
     bridge name    bridge id        STP enabled    interfaces
     br0        8000.38eaa792efe5    no        em2
                                 vnet1
     br1        8000.38eaa792efe6    no        em3
     br2        8000.38eaa792efe7    no        em4
                                 vnet0
     virbr0        8000.525400db3ebf    yes        virbr0-nic

     # more /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em2
     TYPE=Ethernet
     BRIDGE="br0"
     NAME=em2
     DEVICE="em2"
     UUID=aeaa839e-c89c-4d6e-9daa-79b6a1b919bd
     ONBOOT=yes
     HWADDR=38:EA:A7:92:EF:E5
     NM_CONTROLLED="no"

     # more /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0
     TYPE=Bridge
     NM_CONTROLLED="no"
     BOOTPROTO=dhcp
     NAME=br0
     DEVICE="br0"
     ONBOOT=yes

     # ifconfig em2 ;ifconfig br0
     em2: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
             inet6 fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe92:efe5  prefixlen 64  scopeid
0x20<link>
             ether 38:ea:a7:92:ef:e5  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
             RX packets 100093  bytes 52354831 (49.9 MiB)
             RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
             TX packets 25321  bytes 15791341 (15.0 MiB)
             TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
             device memory 0xf7d00000-f7e00000

     br0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
             inet 10.31.99.226  netmask 255.255.252.0  broadcast
10.31.99.255
             inet6 fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe92:efe5  prefixlen 64  scopeid
0x20<link>
             ether 38:ea:a7:92:ef:e5  txqueuelen 0  (Ethernet)
             RX packets 19619  bytes 1963328 (1.8 MiB)
             RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
             TX packets 11  bytes 1074 (1.0 KiB)
             TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

Relevant section from /etc/libvirt/qemu/foo.xml (one of the VMs with
this problem):

     <interface type='bridge'>
           <mac address='52:54:00:26:22:9d'/>
           <source bridge='br0'/>
           <model type='virtio'/>
           <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x03'
function='0x0'/>
     </interface>

I can provide additional information, if requested.  thanks!
_______________________________________________
virt mailing list
virt@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/virt


_______________________________________________
virt mailing list
virt@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/virt

Reply via email to